Aims: To evaluate whether orocoecal transit time (OCTT) might improve the correct allocation (lactose absorbers vs malabsorbers) of subjects with “borderline” H2 Breath test (H2BT) values ranging 10-20 ppm, and to determine among malabsorbers if OCTT can aid to discern lactose intolerant from tolerant individuals. Patients and Methods: OCTT and increment of H2 levels in breath following a dose of lactose were assessed in 49 children (mean age 3.3 years; range 0.6-11.0) suspected of lactose malabsorption. A rise > 20 ppm was used as the criterion to separate malabsorbers from absorbers. Results: OCTT averaged 177 ± 40 minutes (mean ± SD) in 14 H2 producing lactose absorbers and 78 ± 39 minutes in 22 lactose malabsorbers (p< 0.0001). Among lactose malabsorbers, OCTT was more accelerated in intolerant vs tolerant subjects (42 ± 16 vs 131 ± 23 minutes, p< 0.0001). No lactose intolerant subject had an OCTT > 75 minutes and no lactose tolerant subject had an OCTT < 75 minutes (sensitivity and specificity 100%; PPV and NPV 100%). Values between 105 and 175 minutes represented a gray area including both absorbers (21%) and all tolerant malabsorbers (100%). OCTT longer than 175 minutes excluded lactose malabsorption (sensitivity 100%; specificity 69%; PPV 84%; NPV 100%). In 6 out of 8 cases with borderline H2BT results, OCTT clear cut values were useful to reach the correct diagnostic allocation. Conclusions: OCTT evaluation in addition to considering only H2 concentration is a methodological improvement of H2BT procedure. Although it does not represent an absolute gold standard, OCTT testing may aid in reaching a diagnostic conclusion in some patients where clinical and laboratory features after lactose ingestion remains unclear.

Time Course of H2 Production Following Oral Lactose Load in Childrenwith and without Lactose Intolerance

VAJRO, Pietro
2009-01-01

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate whether orocoecal transit time (OCTT) might improve the correct allocation (lactose absorbers vs malabsorbers) of subjects with “borderline” H2 Breath test (H2BT) values ranging 10-20 ppm, and to determine among malabsorbers if OCTT can aid to discern lactose intolerant from tolerant individuals. Patients and Methods: OCTT and increment of H2 levels in breath following a dose of lactose were assessed in 49 children (mean age 3.3 years; range 0.6-11.0) suspected of lactose malabsorption. A rise > 20 ppm was used as the criterion to separate malabsorbers from absorbers. Results: OCTT averaged 177 ± 40 minutes (mean ± SD) in 14 H2 producing lactose absorbers and 78 ± 39 minutes in 22 lactose malabsorbers (p< 0.0001). Among lactose malabsorbers, OCTT was more accelerated in intolerant vs tolerant subjects (42 ± 16 vs 131 ± 23 minutes, p< 0.0001). No lactose intolerant subject had an OCTT > 75 minutes and no lactose tolerant subject had an OCTT < 75 minutes (sensitivity and specificity 100%; PPV and NPV 100%). Values between 105 and 175 minutes represented a gray area including both absorbers (21%) and all tolerant malabsorbers (100%). OCTT longer than 175 minutes excluded lactose malabsorption (sensitivity 100%; specificity 69%; PPV 84%; NPV 100%). In 6 out of 8 cases with borderline H2BT results, OCTT clear cut values were useful to reach the correct diagnostic allocation. Conclusions: OCTT evaluation in addition to considering only H2 concentration is a methodological improvement of H2BT procedure. Although it does not represent an absolute gold standard, OCTT testing may aid in reaching a diagnostic conclusion in some patients where clinical and laboratory features after lactose ingestion remains unclear.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11386/3723681
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact