A singular opacity of self-representation strikes Rainer Maria Rilke when he looks at and describes Cézanne's self-portrait of 1875. In the letters to Clara, sent from Paris in the autumn of 1907, the poet captures an animal figure in the painting – namely, a dog. It is the limit figure of a material presentation of something not representable, at the same time the condition of possibility of the subject and his not representable and unconditional impossibility. But, above all, it is the visual place of a regression of the metaphor and its literary iconography to the alimentary and biological logic of animality, where a figurability of the subject presents itself and perverts the persuasive and exemplary dimension of Self-representation and corrupts the description by the force of the descriptibility. The indirect self-portrait of the poet, delegated to the painter by the rhetorics of ekphrasis, would only be what Marin calls "the universal self-portrait of everyone". We can treat this presentation, which is not static or absolutely opaque, but dynamic, which is a metamorphosis and a distortion of semiotic and hermeneutical skills, like the slow and dense work of a biological Poiesis of the Self, which ruins the meta-discourse of art or literary criticism and of the Rilke’s poetics herself. In Rilke's interpretation of Cézanne, there is an isomorphism between schauen and kauen, between seeing and chewing, reducing the act of seeing and knowing, and also painting, to the food dimension, even elementary. If Walter Benjamin teaches us that animals are the reserve and the trace of the forgotten, Louis Marin suggests a genealogy of the animality of self-representation in Rilke that allows us to probe the latency and inhuman dynamis of Cézanne's self-portrait and to grasp what dwells and haunts the present of the image of painting, its iconic act.

La peinture mangée. Sur Rilke, Cézanne et l’autoportrait

Filippo Fimiani
2018-01-01

Abstract

A singular opacity of self-representation strikes Rainer Maria Rilke when he looks at and describes Cézanne's self-portrait of 1875. In the letters to Clara, sent from Paris in the autumn of 1907, the poet captures an animal figure in the painting – namely, a dog. It is the limit figure of a material presentation of something not representable, at the same time the condition of possibility of the subject and his not representable and unconditional impossibility. But, above all, it is the visual place of a regression of the metaphor and its literary iconography to the alimentary and biological logic of animality, where a figurability of the subject presents itself and perverts the persuasive and exemplary dimension of Self-representation and corrupts the description by the force of the descriptibility. The indirect self-portrait of the poet, delegated to the painter by the rhetorics of ekphrasis, would only be what Marin calls "the universal self-portrait of everyone". We can treat this presentation, which is not static or absolutely opaque, but dynamic, which is a metamorphosis and a distortion of semiotic and hermeneutical skills, like the slow and dense work of a biological Poiesis of the Self, which ruins the meta-discourse of art or literary criticism and of the Rilke’s poetics herself. In Rilke's interpretation of Cézanne, there is an isomorphism between schauen and kauen, between seeing and chewing, reducing the act of seeing and knowing, and also painting, to the food dimension, even elementary. If Walter Benjamin teaches us that animals are the reserve and the trace of the forgotten, Louis Marin suggests a genealogy of the animality of self-representation in Rilke that allows us to probe the latency and inhuman dynamis of Cézanne's self-portrait and to grasp what dwells and haunts the present of the image of painting, its iconic act.
2018
978-2-7132-2723-3
Une singulière opacité de la représentation de soi frappe Rainer Maria Rilke lorsqu’il regarde et décrit l’autoportrait de Cézanne du 1875. Dans les lettres à Clara, envoyé de Paris pendant l’automne 1907, le poète saisit dans le tableau une figure animale – notamment un chien - : c’est la figure-limite d’une présentation matérielle de l’irreprésentable condition de possibilité du sujet et de sa non moins irreprésentable et inconditionnelle impossibilité. Mais, surtout, c’est le lieu visuel d’une régression de la métaphore et de son iconographie littéraire à la logique alimentaire et biologique de l’animalité, où se présente une figurabilité du sujet qui précarise et destitue la dimension persuasive et exemplaire de l’autoreprésentation de soi déplace la description dans la déscriptibilité. L’autoportrait indirect du poète, délégué au peintre grâce à la rhétorique de l’ekphrasis littéraire, ne serait que ce Marin appelle « l’autoportrait universel de chacun ». On peut traiter cette présentation figurale, qui n’est pas statique ni absolument opaque, mais dynamique, qui est une métamorphose et une déformation des compétences sémiotiques et herméneutiques, comme le travail processus lent et dense d’une poïétique du soi qui enlise le méta-discours critique et la théorie poétique elle-même. Chez Rilke interprète de Cézanne, il y a une isomorphie entre schauen et kauen, entre voir et mastiquer, qui réduit l’acte de voir et de savoir, et de peindre aussi, à une dimension alimentaire, voire élémentaire. Si Walter Benjamin nous apprend que les bêtes sont la réserve et la trace de l’oublié, Louis Marin nous suggère une généalogie de l’animalité de la représentation de soi chez Rilke que nous permet de sonder la latence et la virtualité inhumaines de l’autoportrait de Cézanne et de saisir ce qui habite et hante le présent de l’image de la peinture, son acte iconique.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11386/4716667
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact