The article compares Ferrajoli’s conception of constitutional review with the Kelsenian Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit. The comparison is worthy not only as such – by making clear strenghts and shortcomings of both authors –, but also as a way to underscore that, if we all agree that the government is legally limited in its powers by constitutional rights and principles, the protection of them through constitutional review – particularly that performed by constitutional courts – cannot be always regarded as something purely judicial.

Kelsen, Ferrajoli e la "logica" della giustizia costituzionale

giovanni bisogni
2020

Abstract

The article compares Ferrajoli’s conception of constitutional review with the Kelsenian Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit. The comparison is worthy not only as such – by making clear strenghts and shortcomings of both authors –, but also as a way to underscore that, if we all agree that the government is legally limited in its powers by constitutional rights and principles, the protection of them through constitutional review – particularly that performed by constitutional courts – cannot be always regarded as something purely judicial.
2020
9788892101340
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11386/4737138
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact