The interpretation of Arist. Ath. Pol. fr. 3 constitutes an appropriate demonstration from a methodological viewpoint. During the last 40 years, the category of the fragment has become something ‘other’ than the past. The highly hypothetical level of all that concerns it has been taken into account and consequently demands to be addressed not only in commentaries or in theoretical studies. The time has come to apply this methodological attainment also, and especially, to historical reconstruction when it uses fragments as a source.

Historical Fragments Preserved by the Indirect Tradition: Some Evaluations from Theory to Practice

MARINA POLITO
2020-01-01

Abstract

The interpretation of Arist. Ath. Pol. fr. 3 constitutes an appropriate demonstration from a methodological viewpoint. During the last 40 years, the category of the fragment has become something ‘other’ than the past. The highly hypothetical level of all that concerns it has been taken into account and consequently demands to be addressed not only in commentaries or in theoretical studies. The time has come to apply this methodological attainment also, and especially, to historical reconstruction when it uses fragments as a source.
2020
978-88-3369-101-5
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11386/4752615
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact