The paper proposes some short observations about Him. or. 30, an ἐπιβατήριος λόγος that differs from the prescriptions of Menander rhetor, perhaps because it is an internal speech to the school, not one addressed, like other λόγοι of the same type, to dignitaries for official occasions; and it proposes brief remarks about a mention of Hippias in or. 39.4, not as a simple variatio of a Platonic passage, but as a reference which combines some features of the figure of the Sophist to that of Odysseus, as part of an erudite tradition.
Due noterelle a Imerio
Massimo Lazzeri
2021-01-01
Abstract
The paper proposes some short observations about Him. or. 30, an ἐπιβατήριος λόγος that differs from the prescriptions of Menander rhetor, perhaps because it is an internal speech to the school, not one addressed, like other λόγοι of the same type, to dignitaries for official occasions; and it proposes brief remarks about a mention of Hippias in or. 39.4, not as a simple variatio of a Platonic passage, but as a reference which combines some features of the figure of the Sophist to that of Odysseus, as part of an erudite tradition.File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
