Background The origin of artifacts of the ascending aorta during transesophageal echocardiography has not been widely studied. This study was undertaken to investigate in vivo whether anatomic features could determine the appearance of artifacts. Methods and Results Transesophageal echocardiograms of 46 patients studied for suspected dissection with proven diagnosis (30 patients with and 16 without ascending aortic dissection) were reviewed. The incidence of artifacts was 46%, and it was similar in patients with and those without dissection (chi-square 0.516; P = not significant). Artifacts were located in the aortic lumen twice as far from the transducer as the atrial-aortic interface. The aortic diameter was larger in patients with than in those without artifacts (6.4 ± 1.1 vs 4.2 ± 0.9 cm, P < .001). An aortic diameter >5 cm and an atrialaortic ratio ²0.6 predicted the artifact appearance with good sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and diagnostic accuracy; these parameters reached a value of 100% by analysis only of patients without dissection. Conclusions An ascending aortic diameter >5.0 cm that exceeds the left atrial diameter with an atrial-aortic ratio ²0.6 creates in vivo the conditions for the reverberation of the atrial-aortic interface within the aorta. Therefore, in patients with such anatomic features, artifacts must be suspected in the presence of linear structures within the aorta.

Determinants of Aortic Artifacts During Transesophageal Echocardiography of the Ascending Aorta

PACE, Leonardo;
1999-01-01

Abstract

Background The origin of artifacts of the ascending aorta during transesophageal echocardiography has not been widely studied. This study was undertaken to investigate in vivo whether anatomic features could determine the appearance of artifacts. Methods and Results Transesophageal echocardiograms of 46 patients studied for suspected dissection with proven diagnosis (30 patients with and 16 without ascending aortic dissection) were reviewed. The incidence of artifacts was 46%, and it was similar in patients with and those without dissection (chi-square 0.516; P = not significant). Artifacts were located in the aortic lumen twice as far from the transducer as the atrial-aortic interface. The aortic diameter was larger in patients with than in those without artifacts (6.4 ± 1.1 vs 4.2 ± 0.9 cm, P < .001). An aortic diameter >5 cm and an atrialaortic ratio ²0.6 predicted the artifact appearance with good sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and diagnostic accuracy; these parameters reached a value of 100% by analysis only of patients without dissection. Conclusions An ascending aortic diameter >5.0 cm that exceeds the left atrial diameter with an atrial-aortic ratio ²0.6 creates in vivo the conditions for the reverberation of the atrial-aortic interface within the aorta. Therefore, in patients with such anatomic features, artifacts must be suspected in the presence of linear structures within the aorta.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11386/3094258
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 19
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 14
social impact