The article examines, from the point of view of political philosophy, the conflicts of interpration arising between law and ecomics in the current neoliberal governmentality. The economic logic of optimization, that is unlimited and problem solving, crosses and determines the legal logic that follows the coherence and the limit. The modern legal logic produced judgements and status tending to universal and was based on the inclusion/exclusion and on the rule ex ante. Instead the managerial logic, applied to the law, produces evaluation, hierarchies and selective inclusion: its rules are standards ex post, flexible and undecidable. The case of the criterion of Systemic Deficit shows these contradictions.
Diritti e valutazione nella governamentalità neoliberale
BAZZICALUPO, Laura
2015
Abstract
The article examines, from the point of view of political philosophy, the conflicts of interpration arising between law and ecomics in the current neoliberal governmentality. The economic logic of optimization, that is unlimited and problem solving, crosses and determines the legal logic that follows the coherence and the limit. The modern legal logic produced judgements and status tending to universal and was based on the inclusion/exclusion and on the rule ex ante. Instead the managerial logic, applied to the law, produces evaluation, hierarchies and selective inclusion: its rules are standards ex post, flexible and undecidable. The case of the criterion of Systemic Deficit shows these contradictions.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
