Background and rationale of the study. Hepatitis C infection is very common among injection drug users(IDUs). In clinical practice there is reluctance to treat IDUs, because considered difficult-to-treat. Aim of this study was to evaluate the response to antiviral treatment in IDUs compared to non-IDUs. MAIN RESULTS: In this observational retrospective study, 204 non cirrhotic patients(112 IDUs, 92 non-IDUs) with chronic hepatitis C, treated with PEG-IFN and ribavirin in a tertiary centre for IDUs of Southern Italy from 2008 to 2011 were analyzed. Age, sex, genotype, steatosis, response to previous therapy, rapid(RVR), early(EVR), end-of-treatment(ETR), sustained(SVR) virological response were evaluated. IDUs were mainly young and males, with prevalence of genotype 3. A higher SVR rate in IDUs group compared to non-IDUs only in PerProtocol(PP) analysis (90% vs. 78,9% ;p = 0.04). On the contrary, in IntentionToTreat(ITT) analysis, no significant difference was relieved. A higher SVR rate at ITT analyses in naïve non-IDUs patients was found (76,13% vs. 90%, p = 0.021), but at PP analysis wasn't confirmed. Treatment was well tolerated; a higher dropout rate was reported in IDUs (24 patients) compared to non-IDUs (2 patients). In order to exclude the effect of viral genotypes on SVR a genotype matched statistical analysis was done and no difference was found. CONCLUSIONS: IDUs naïve patients, due to young age and high prevalence of genotype 3, appear good candidates to dual antiviral therapy with high SVR rates. Dropout is the main non-response cause among these subjects, but through an optimal monitoring program with a multidisciplinary setting, their "difficult to treat" characteristics can be overcome.

HCV antiviral therapy in injection drug users: difficult to treat or easy to cure?

PERSICO, Marcello;MASARONE, MARIO;
2015-01-01

Abstract

Background and rationale of the study. Hepatitis C infection is very common among injection drug users(IDUs). In clinical practice there is reluctance to treat IDUs, because considered difficult-to-treat. Aim of this study was to evaluate the response to antiviral treatment in IDUs compared to non-IDUs. MAIN RESULTS: In this observational retrospective study, 204 non cirrhotic patients(112 IDUs, 92 non-IDUs) with chronic hepatitis C, treated with PEG-IFN and ribavirin in a tertiary centre for IDUs of Southern Italy from 2008 to 2011 were analyzed. Age, sex, genotype, steatosis, response to previous therapy, rapid(RVR), early(EVR), end-of-treatment(ETR), sustained(SVR) virological response were evaluated. IDUs were mainly young and males, with prevalence of genotype 3. A higher SVR rate in IDUs group compared to non-IDUs only in PerProtocol(PP) analysis (90% vs. 78,9% ;p = 0.04). On the contrary, in IntentionToTreat(ITT) analysis, no significant difference was relieved. A higher SVR rate at ITT analyses in naïve non-IDUs patients was found (76,13% vs. 90%, p = 0.021), but at PP analysis wasn't confirmed. Treatment was well tolerated; a higher dropout rate was reported in IDUs (24 patients) compared to non-IDUs (2 patients). In order to exclude the effect of viral genotypes on SVR a genotype matched statistical analysis was done and no difference was found. CONCLUSIONS: IDUs naïve patients, due to young age and high prevalence of genotype 3, appear good candidates to dual antiviral therapy with high SVR rates. Dropout is the main non-response cause among these subjects, but through an optimal monitoring program with a multidisciplinary setting, their "difficult to treat" characteristics can be overcome.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11386/4675005
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact