Background: The optimum age for Essential Infantile Esotropia surgery is a controversial subject. Sensory status was evaluated in patients who underwent surgery at different ages in a retrospective study. The setting of the study is the ophthalmology department of a teaching hospital. Methods: Different clinical characters were analyzed pre- and postoperatively; nine different surgeries were performed. A total of 188 patients presented valid postoperative sensorial data, divided in two groups: surgery at ≤2 years (n=69) or >2 years (n=119). Sensory status was dichotomized in binocular single vision (BSV) and exclusion. Univariate differences were assessed with the chi-square test (or Fisher exact test). To identify the independent role of factors associated with the sensory status, all variables showing in univariate analyses a significant association (p<0.05) with the outcome variable were entered into a multivariate logistic regression model. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Multivariate analysis confirmed that children operated >2 years were 0.4 times less likely to obtain BSV compared with children operated at ≤2 years (AOR. 0.38, 95% C.I. 0.17–0.89, p=0.025). Patients operated on by OO MR rec.+ OO LR res. + OO IO rec.-ap. (intervention type 6) were about 11 times more likely to have BSV than those by OO rec.MR + unilateral res. LR (operation type 2); AOR.: 10.67, 95% C.I.: 1.34 – 85.29, p=0.026). Twenty-nine patients (12.1%) operated at ≤2 years of age underwent a reoperation, compared to 33 (8.6%) who underwent surgery after two years (p>0.05). Conclusions: Our findings suggest to perform EIE surgery between age 1 and 2 and, when indicated, to prefer a six-muscle approach in order to achieve a better sensory function.

Essential Infantile Esotropia: Postoperative Sensory Outcomes of Strabismus Surgery

Magli, Adriano
;
2017-01-01

Abstract

Background: The optimum age for Essential Infantile Esotropia surgery is a controversial subject. Sensory status was evaluated in patients who underwent surgery at different ages in a retrospective study. The setting of the study is the ophthalmology department of a teaching hospital. Methods: Different clinical characters were analyzed pre- and postoperatively; nine different surgeries were performed. A total of 188 patients presented valid postoperative sensorial data, divided in two groups: surgery at ≤2 years (n=69) or >2 years (n=119). Sensory status was dichotomized in binocular single vision (BSV) and exclusion. Univariate differences were assessed with the chi-square test (or Fisher exact test). To identify the independent role of factors associated with the sensory status, all variables showing in univariate analyses a significant association (p<0.05) with the outcome variable were entered into a multivariate logistic regression model. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Multivariate analysis confirmed that children operated >2 years were 0.4 times less likely to obtain BSV compared with children operated at ≤2 years (AOR. 0.38, 95% C.I. 0.17–0.89, p=0.025). Patients operated on by OO MR rec.+ OO LR res. + OO IO rec.-ap. (intervention type 6) were about 11 times more likely to have BSV than those by OO rec.MR + unilateral res. LR (operation type 2); AOR.: 10.67, 95% C.I.: 1.34 – 85.29, p=0.026). Twenty-nine patients (12.1%) operated at ≤2 years of age underwent a reoperation, compared to 33 (8.6%) who underwent surgery after two years (p>0.05). Conclusions: Our findings suggest to perform EIE surgery between age 1 and 2 and, when indicated, to prefer a six-muscle approach in order to achieve a better sensory function.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11386/4700451
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact