This comment shows that Peng (2018)’s Theorem 2 requires amendment. A new set of (relatively stricter) assumptions is provided, under which Peng (2018)’s findings –in particular, the asymmetric impact of capital and income risk on wealth mobility –hold true, and the approach developed therein proves suited for comparing stationary distributions of linear stochastic models.

Comparing inequality and mobility in linear models: Comment

Di Pietro, Christian;Sorge, Marco M.
2018

Abstract

This comment shows that Peng (2018)’s Theorem 2 requires amendment. A new set of (relatively stricter) assumptions is provided, under which Peng (2018)’s findings –in particular, the asymmetric impact of capital and income risk on wealth mobility –hold true, and the approach developed therein proves suited for comparing stationary distributions of linear stochastic models.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11386/4714764
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact