The CO2 capture in Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) plants causes a significant increase of the cost of electricity (COE) and thus determines high CO2mitigation cost (cost per ton of avoided CO2emissions). In this work the economic sustainability of the co-production of pure hydrogen in addition to the electricity production was assessed by detailed process simulations and a techno-economic analysis. To produce pure hydrogen a Water Gas Shift reactor and a Selexol®process was combined with H2selective palladium membranes. This innovative process section was compared with the more conventional Pressure Swing Adsorption in order to produce amount of pure hydrogen up to 20% of the total hydrogen available in the syngas. Assuming for a base case a hydrogen selling price of 3 €/kg and a palladium membrane cost of 9200 €/m2, a cost of electricity (COE) of 64 €/MWh and a mitigation cost of 20 €/tonCO2were obtained for 90% captured CO2and 10% hydrogen recovery. An increase of the hydrogen recovery up to 20% determines a reduction of the COE and of the mitigation cost to 50 €/MWh and 5 €/tonCO2, respectively. A sensitivity analysis showed that even a 50% increase of cost of the membrane per unit surface could determine a COE increase of only about 10% and a maximum increase of the mitigation cost of further 5 €/tonCO2.

Pure hydrogen co-production by membrane technology in an IGCC power plant with carbon capture

GIULIANO, ARISTIDE;Poletto, Massimo;Barletta, Diego
2018-01-01

Abstract

The CO2 capture in Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) plants causes a significant increase of the cost of electricity (COE) and thus determines high CO2mitigation cost (cost per ton of avoided CO2emissions). In this work the economic sustainability of the co-production of pure hydrogen in addition to the electricity production was assessed by detailed process simulations and a techno-economic analysis. To produce pure hydrogen a Water Gas Shift reactor and a Selexol®process was combined with H2selective palladium membranes. This innovative process section was compared with the more conventional Pressure Swing Adsorption in order to produce amount of pure hydrogen up to 20% of the total hydrogen available in the syngas. Assuming for a base case a hydrogen selling price of 3 €/kg and a palladium membrane cost of 9200 €/m2, a cost of electricity (COE) of 64 €/MWh and a mitigation cost of 20 €/tonCO2were obtained for 90% captured CO2and 10% hydrogen recovery. An increase of the hydrogen recovery up to 20% determines a reduction of the COE and of the mitigation cost to 50 €/MWh and 5 €/tonCO2, respectively. A sensitivity analysis showed that even a 50% increase of cost of the membrane per unit surface could determine a COE increase of only about 10% and a maximum increase of the mitigation cost of further 5 €/tonCO2.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Giuliano2018IGCCH2.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 936.46 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
936.46 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
GiulianoH2IGCCpostprint.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.08.112
Tipologia: Documento in Pre-print (manoscritto inviato all'editore, precedente alla peer review)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 732.58 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
732.58 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11386/4718856
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 33
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 30
social impact