This work deals with the effective modelling and simulation of the behavior of stiffened panels, when subjected to compressive (buckling) loads. Within the Finite Element Method, two numerical strategies are compared, namely the Riks method and the displacement incremental control method, including damping effects. The capabilities and limitations of both approaches are explored for two distinct benchmarks: a panel with a blade stiffener, and a panel with a T shaped stiffener. In both cases, material (plasticity) and geometrical (large displacements) nonlinearities are considered, together with a modelling strategy based on shell elements. Following previous works of the authors, each panel accounts for initial geometric imperfections coming from friction stir welding joining operations. The paper shows a number of considerations that must be undertaken when choosing between one of the two modelling strategies. Both benchmarks involve a number of challenges from the point of view of modelling unstable structural behaviors, and therefore the proposed benchmarks can represent a valid set of case studies in the understanding of the capabilities of current numerical simulation codes.

Numerical simulation of the buckling behaviour of stiffened panels: Benchmarks for assessment of distinct modelling strategies

Carlone P.;Rubino F.
2019-01-01

Abstract

This work deals with the effective modelling and simulation of the behavior of stiffened panels, when subjected to compressive (buckling) loads. Within the Finite Element Method, two numerical strategies are compared, namely the Riks method and the displacement incremental control method, including damping effects. The capabilities and limitations of both approaches are explored for two distinct benchmarks: a panel with a blade stiffener, and a panel with a T shaped stiffener. In both cases, material (plasticity) and geometrical (large displacements) nonlinearities are considered, together with a modelling strategy based on shell elements. Following previous works of the authors, each panel accounts for initial geometric imperfections coming from friction stir welding joining operations. The paper shows a number of considerations that must be undertaken when choosing between one of the two modelling strategies. Both benchmarks involve a number of challenges from the point of view of modelling unstable structural behaviors, and therefore the proposed benchmarks can represent a valid set of case studies in the understanding of the capabilities of current numerical simulation codes.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11386/4731545
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact