The third year of Human Arenas presents number of developmental tasks. After 2 years of experimentation, Human Arenas is becoming an acknowledged interdisciplinary space for intellectual bravery. We discuss peer-reviewing as one of the fundamental parts of intellectual activity. Too often, scholars dismiss this task as a time-consuming and useless activity that has no gain in academic competition. We claim that the peer-review process may be considered a developmental intellectual arena for both the reviewer and the reviewed.

Tateo, L., Marsico, G. (2020). Reviewing as Dialogical Development of Ideas. Human Arenas.3(1), 1-5 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-020-00100-2

Marsico Giuseppina
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
2020

Abstract

The third year of Human Arenas presents number of developmental tasks. After 2 years of experimentation, Human Arenas is becoming an acknowledged interdisciplinary space for intellectual bravery. We discuss peer-reviewing as one of the fundamental parts of intellectual activity. Too often, scholars dismiss this task as a time-consuming and useless activity that has no gain in academic competition. We claim that the peer-review process may be considered a developmental intellectual arena for both the reviewer and the reviewed.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11386/4734893
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact