The third year of Human Arenas presents number of developmental tasks. After 2 years of experimentation, Human Arenas is becoming an acknowledged interdisciplinary space for intellectual bravery. We discuss peer-reviewing as one of the fundamental parts of intellectual activity. Too often, scholars dismiss this task as a time-consuming and useless activity that has no gain in academic competition. We claim that the peer-review process may be considered a developmental intellectual arena for both the reviewer and the reviewed.
Tateo, L., Marsico, G. (2020). Reviewing as Dialogical Development of Ideas. Human Arenas.3(1), 1-5 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-020-00100-2
Marsico GiuseppinaWriting – Original Draft Preparation
2020
Abstract
The third year of Human Arenas presents number of developmental tasks. After 2 years of experimentation, Human Arenas is becoming an acknowledged interdisciplinary space for intellectual bravery. We discuss peer-reviewing as one of the fundamental parts of intellectual activity. Too often, scholars dismiss this task as a time-consuming and useless activity that has no gain in academic competition. We claim that the peer-review process may be considered a developmental intellectual arena for both the reviewer and the reviewed.File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.