This article aims to support Housman’s hypothesis that a line was omitted in Lucan after 10,122. Housman’s proposed addition is supported by the literary tradition (Catullus, Virgil and Manilius) to which Lucan’s passage is related.
Intertextuality and Textual Criticism: apropos of Lucan. 10,122-123
Nicola Lanzarone
2021-01-01
Abstract
This article aims to support Housman’s hypothesis that a line was omitted in Lucan after 10,122. Housman’s proposed addition is supported by the literary tradition (Catullus, Virgil and Manilius) to which Lucan’s passage is related.File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
