SFX Get it!(opens in a new window)|View at Publisher| Export | Download | More... Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Volume 35, Issue 3, June 2011, Pages 398-401 L-specular plasty versus double-round plasty: Two new techniques for earlobe split repair (Article) Chiummariello, S., Iera, M., Arleo, S. , Alfano, C. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy View references (16) Abstract Background: Split earlobes can be classified into two groups: congenital and traumatic. The congenital group can be divided into three categories: anterior, posterior with doubled earlobe, and sagittal. The traumatic group can be divided into two categories: complete and incomplete. This report describes and compares two new techniques the authors have developed for split earlobe repair: L-specular plasty and double-curve-specular plasty. Both techniques are simple to perform and deliver a good aesthetic result. Methods: A series of 30 patients with split earlobes underwent surgery from September 2007 to September 2009. All the patients enjoyed good health with no organic pathologies. All the patients had surgery under local anesthesia. The L-specular plasty technique was used to treat 15 patients (13 complete splits, 2 incomplete splits). The remaining 15 patients (13 complete splits, 2 incomplete splits) were treated with the double-curve-specular plasty. Results: Skin necrosis was not reported for any of the treated patients. Sutures are completely removed after 2 weeks. The sutures for three patients were removed after 20 days due to slow cicatrization. Repiercing of the ear may occur after 6 months. One patient (8%) experienced a wound infection, treated successfully with systemic antibiotic therapy. Two patients (16%) experienced hypertrophic scars. Only two patients (16%) had recurrence during a mean follow-up period of 13.4 months (range, 6-24 months: September 2007-2009). Conclusion: Both double-curve-specular plasty and L-specular plasty are simple, reliable procedures. They both deliver very good aesthetic results thanks to the curve incisions that follow the natural shape of the earlobe. However, the patients treated with double-curve-specular plasty reported greater satisfaction in the outcome of their surgery
L-Specular Plasty Versus Double-Round Plasty: Two New Techniques for Earlobe Split Repair
C. ALFANO
2011-01-01
Abstract
SFX Get it!(opens in a new window)|View at Publisher| Export | Download | More... Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Volume 35, Issue 3, June 2011, Pages 398-401 L-specular plasty versus double-round plasty: Two new techniques for earlobe split repair (Article) Chiummariello, S., Iera, M., Arleo, S. , Alfano, C. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy View references (16) Abstract Background: Split earlobes can be classified into two groups: congenital and traumatic. The congenital group can be divided into three categories: anterior, posterior with doubled earlobe, and sagittal. The traumatic group can be divided into two categories: complete and incomplete. This report describes and compares two new techniques the authors have developed for split earlobe repair: L-specular plasty and double-curve-specular plasty. Both techniques are simple to perform and deliver a good aesthetic result. Methods: A series of 30 patients with split earlobes underwent surgery from September 2007 to September 2009. All the patients enjoyed good health with no organic pathologies. All the patients had surgery under local anesthesia. The L-specular plasty technique was used to treat 15 patients (13 complete splits, 2 incomplete splits). The remaining 15 patients (13 complete splits, 2 incomplete splits) were treated with the double-curve-specular plasty. Results: Skin necrosis was not reported for any of the treated patients. Sutures are completely removed after 2 weeks. The sutures for three patients were removed after 20 days due to slow cicatrization. Repiercing of the ear may occur after 6 months. One patient (8%) experienced a wound infection, treated successfully with systemic antibiotic therapy. Two patients (16%) experienced hypertrophic scars. Only two patients (16%) had recurrence during a mean follow-up period of 13.4 months (range, 6-24 months: September 2007-2009). Conclusion: Both double-curve-specular plasty and L-specular plasty are simple, reliable procedures. They both deliver very good aesthetic results thanks to the curve incisions that follow the natural shape of the earlobe. However, the patients treated with double-curve-specular plasty reported greater satisfaction in the outcome of their surgeryI documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
