The annulment of Directive 2006/24/EC has triggered a close dialogue between national courts and the Court of Justice of the European Union on the legality and proportionality of national data retention laws on the protection of fundamental rights. In this context, the judgment in case C-140/20, Commissioner of An Garda Sìochana judgment, crystallizes the recent position of the Court to justify the general and indiscriminate data retention vis-à-vis the need to protect the essential functions and fundamental interests of the State concerning genuine and present, or foreseeable, threats to its security.
IL DIFFICILE BILANCIAMENTO TRA SICUREZZA NAZIONALE E TUTELA DEI DIRITTI FONDAMENTALI NELLA “DATA RETENTION SAGA” DINANZI ALLA CORTE DI GIUSTIZIA UE
Naddeo, Giovanna
2022-01-01
Abstract
The annulment of Directive 2006/24/EC has triggered a close dialogue between national courts and the Court of Justice of the European Union on the legality and proportionality of national data retention laws on the protection of fundamental rights. In this context, the judgment in case C-140/20, Commissioner of An Garda Sìochana judgment, crystallizes the recent position of the Court to justify the general and indiscriminate data retention vis-à-vis the need to protect the essential functions and fundamental interests of the State concerning genuine and present, or foreseeable, threats to its security.File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
