The judgment under comment (Council of State, Fifth Section, n. 7787/2023) addresses two problematic issues. On the one hand, the ostensibility or otherwise of a document of which the Administration declares that it does not have the material and legal availability. On the other, in the face of such a declaration, on whom does the relevant evidentiary burden rest. The judges of the Palazzo Spada, affirmed that the declared unavailability of a document sterilizes the right of access, and further held that the burden of proof to the contrary of the document´s supposed availability rests on the applicant

IL CONSIGLIO DI STATO SUI LIMITI AL DIRITTO DI ACCESSO PER DOCUMENTI CHE LA P.A. DICHIARA DI NON POSSEDERE

D'Elia Antonietta
2023-01-01

Abstract

The judgment under comment (Council of State, Fifth Section, n. 7787/2023) addresses two problematic issues. On the one hand, the ostensibility or otherwise of a document of which the Administration declares that it does not have the material and legal availability. On the other, in the face of such a declaration, on whom does the relevant evidentiary burden rest. The judges of the Palazzo Spada, affirmed that the declared unavailability of a document sterilizes the right of access, and further held that the burden of proof to the contrary of the document´s supposed availability rests on the applicant
2023
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11386/4853275
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact