The judgment under comment (Council of State, Fifth Section, n. 7787/2023) addresses two problematic issues. On the one hand, the ostensibility or otherwise of a document of which the Administration declares that it does not have the material and legal availability. On the other, in the face of such a declaration, on whom does the relevant evidentiary burden rest. The judges of the Palazzo Spada, affirmed that the declared unavailability of a document sterilizes the right of access, and further held that the burden of proof to the contrary of the document´s supposed availability rests on the applicant
IL CONSIGLIO DI STATO SUI LIMITI AL DIRITTO DI ACCESSO PER DOCUMENTI CHE LA P.A. DICHIARA DI NON POSSEDERE
D'Elia Antonietta
2023-01-01
Abstract
The judgment under comment (Council of State, Fifth Section, n. 7787/2023) addresses two problematic issues. On the one hand, the ostensibility or otherwise of a document of which the Administration declares that it does not have the material and legal availability. On the other, in the face of such a declaration, on whom does the relevant evidentiary burden rest. The judges of the Palazzo Spada, affirmed that the declared unavailability of a document sterilizes the right of access, and further held that the burden of proof to the contrary of the document´s supposed availability rests on the applicantFile in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.