The judgment under comment (Council of State, Fifth Section, n. 7787/2023) addresses two problematic issues. On the one hand, the ostensibility or otherwise of a document of which the Administration declares that it does not have the material and legal availability. On the other, in the face of such a declaration, on whom does the relevant evidentiary burden rest. The judges of the Palazzo Spada, affirmed that the declared unavailability of a document sterilizes the right of access, and further held that the burden of proof to the contrary of the document´s supposed availability rests on the applicant
IL CONSIGLIO DI STATO SUI LIMITI AL DIRITTO DI ACCESSO PER DOCUMENTI CHE LA P.A. DICHIARA DI NON POSSEDERE
D'Elia Antonietta
2023
Abstract
The judgment under comment (Council of State, Fifth Section, n. 7787/2023) addresses two problematic issues. On the one hand, the ostensibility or otherwise of a document of which the Administration declares that it does not have the material and legal availability. On the other, in the face of such a declaration, on whom does the relevant evidentiary burden rest. The judges of the Palazzo Spada, affirmed that the declared unavailability of a document sterilizes the right of access, and further held that the burden of proof to the contrary of the document´s supposed availability rests on the applicantFile in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.