This research will offer a metatheorical understanding of the problem inside analytical legal philosophy of the twentieth-one century about the choice of a theory which gives account of the legal practice, purposing two discursive blocks: in one hand the theories which represent the monism, in the other which ascribe to pluralism. The aim of this plan is to conclude that is preferable choice a pluralist theory. For that purpose the analysis will support three discussion levels. First exposing triple distinction methodology of this research, this is directed to the intellectual division between monism and pluralism. Second in section III will examine the most relevant theories of the twentieth century analytical tradition of philosophy of law in the latter discussion level. Third in section IV will evaluate the problem of epistemic value or merits of theories about law, related with the possibility of stablish an argumentative conception that enriches the understanding of nowadays metaphilosophical debates.

Metateoría jurídica analítica del siglo XXI: Teorías monistas y pluralistas en el estudio del Derecho

Lopez Perez, Nicolas Alberto
2015-01-01

Abstract

This research will offer a metatheorical understanding of the problem inside analytical legal philosophy of the twentieth-one century about the choice of a theory which gives account of the legal practice, purposing two discursive blocks: in one hand the theories which represent the monism, in the other which ascribe to pluralism. The aim of this plan is to conclude that is preferable choice a pluralist theory. For that purpose the analysis will support three discussion levels. First exposing triple distinction methodology of this research, this is directed to the intellectual division between monism and pluralism. Second in section III will examine the most relevant theories of the twentieth century analytical tradition of philosophy of law in the latter discussion level. Third in section IV will evaluate the problem of epistemic value or merits of theories about law, related with the possibility of stablish an argumentative conception that enriches the understanding of nowadays metaphilosophical debates.
2015
Esta investigación ofrecerá una comprensión metateórica del problema que radica en la filosofía analítica del derecho del siglo XXI acerca de la elección de una teoría que dé cuenta de la práctica jurídica, planteando que hay dos bloques discursivos: por una parte, las teorías que representan el monismo y por otra, las que adscriben al pluralismo. La finalidad del estudio es concluir que es preferible inclinarse por una teoría de carácter pluralista. Para dicho propósito, el análisis soportará tres niveles de discusión. El primero, desde la exposición de la metodología de trabajo, la triple distinción, que, a la postre decanta en la división intelectual entre monismo y pluralismo. El segundo, en la sección III procederá a examinar las teorías más relevantes del siglo XX en la tradición analítica de la filosofía del derecho en el nivel de discusión precedente. El tercero, en la sección IV, evaluará el problema del valor o mérito epistémico de las teorías sobre el derecho, relacionándolo con la posibilidad de establecer una concepción argumentativa que enriquezca el entendimiento de los debates metafilosóficos actuales.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11386/4858353
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact