Our everyday lives are full of encounters that we classify as services. They include dialogues with others that are socially normative and personally meaningful. By following the historical growth of humanity, it becomes increasingly more crucial to elaborate the interconnectivity of human interactions. While experiencing our everyday life, we are generating meaning that is used for interactions with other beings, "interpretation and interaction." By elaborating the meaning of dialogue and the historical roots of service, it seems crucial to point out the baseline meaning behind both constructs and how these can be seen as identical phenomenon. Such a bonding of constructs is allowing us to reconstruct the generated meaning in form of a new model: the "Human Identification Dialogue" (HID), highlighting the core dimensions of both constructions. The HID can be described as connection and extension of the strongly influencing theoretical understandings, about dialogues, by Buhler (1934) and Rommetveit in (The Dialogical Alternative: Towards a Theory of Language and Mind, 19, 44, 1992). Furthermore, the cultural psychological view allows us to include the importance of individual perception in a core process of the business field. A process that will be bonded in simple everyday life examples, able to visualize the importance of the phenomena, while underlining its potential and characteristics. In this context, the cultural psychological field and the service psychology will be connected by the basic Semiotic understanding of the core process dialogue.

Dialogue Around Favors: Introducing a Field Model of How Service is Psychologically Possible

Campill, Marc Antoine
2024-01-01

Abstract

Our everyday lives are full of encounters that we classify as services. They include dialogues with others that are socially normative and personally meaningful. By following the historical growth of humanity, it becomes increasingly more crucial to elaborate the interconnectivity of human interactions. While experiencing our everyday life, we are generating meaning that is used for interactions with other beings, "interpretation and interaction." By elaborating the meaning of dialogue and the historical roots of service, it seems crucial to point out the baseline meaning behind both constructs and how these can be seen as identical phenomenon. Such a bonding of constructs is allowing us to reconstruct the generated meaning in form of a new model: the "Human Identification Dialogue" (HID), highlighting the core dimensions of both constructions. The HID can be described as connection and extension of the strongly influencing theoretical understandings, about dialogues, by Buhler (1934) and Rommetveit in (The Dialogical Alternative: Towards a Theory of Language and Mind, 19, 44, 1992). Furthermore, the cultural psychological view allows us to include the importance of individual perception in a core process of the business field. A process that will be bonded in simple everyday life examples, able to visualize the importance of the phenomena, while underlining its potential and characteristics. In this context, the cultural psychological field and the service psychology will be connected by the basic Semiotic understanding of the core process dialogue.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11386/4882212
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact