Thermal, Mechanical, Morphological, and Piezoresistive Properties of Poly(ethylene-co-methacrylic acid) (EMAA) with Carbon Nanotubes and Expanded Graphite

This paper presents a comparative study examining the effects of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and expanded graphite (EG) on the thermal, mechanical, morphological, electrical, and piezoresistive properties of poly(ethylene-co-methacrylic acid) (EMAA) nanocomposites. To this end, different amounts of carbonaceous fillers (EG and CNTs separately) were added to the EMAA thermoplastic matrix, and the relative electrical percolation thresholds (EPTs) were determined. The effect of filler concentration on thermo-oxidative degradation and the EMAA crystallinity was investigated via thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), respectively. Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) demonstrated that both fillers enhance the Young’s and storage moduli, as well as the glass transition temperature, with a greater improvement for the bidimensional nanofiller, most likely due to the cumulative effect of more extensive EG-matrix interactions. In tensile tests, a very relevant difference was detected in the Gauge Factor (G.F.) and the elongation at break of the two typologies of nanocomposites. The G.F. of EMAA 10% CNT and EMAA 15% EG were found to be 0.5 ± 0.08 and 165 ± 14, respectively, while elongation at break was about 68% for EMAA 10% CNT and 8% for EMAA 15% EG. Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM) and Tunneling Atomic Force Microscopy (TUNA) have contributed to explaining the differences between EG- and CNT-based nanocomposites from a morphological point of view, underlying the pivotal role of the filler aspect ratio and its structural features in determining different mechanical and piezoresistive performance. The comprehensive analysis of EMAA-EG and EMAA-CNT nanocomposites provides a guide for selecting the best self-sensing system for the specific application. More specifically, EMAA-CNT nanocomposites with high elongation at break and lower sensitivity to small strains are suitable for movement sensors in the soft robotic field, where high deformation has to be detected. On the other hand, the high sensitivity at a low strain of EMAA-EG systems makes them suitable for integrated sensors in more rigid composite structures, such as aeronautical and automotive components or wind turbines.