This essay aims to reconstruct on a historical-theoretical level how the centrality of the receiver was defined and consolidated in 20th century linguistics. An important milestone is Ferdinand de Saussure, who – inspired in particular by Wundt, Paul, Bréal and Ribot – formulated the role of the speaking subject as an indispensable component of his linguistic system. In Saussure’s framework, the speaking subject alternates between the roles of Monsieur A (the speaker) and Monsieur B (the receiver), as can be observed in the so-called circuit de la parole. The latter not only takes on decoding tasks but also has an active and creative role. With Charles Bally, however, Monsieur B receives a specific designation (that of the sujet entendant in its double function as perceiver and interpreter/hermeneut) and becomes the cornerstone of a more general theoretical construction. Without the sujet entendant there is neither a perceptive-sensory activity nor a semiotic-cognitive activity. Thus, the sujet entendant becomes the site of the existence and legitimization of language and its continuous interpragmatic confirmation at the level of understanding.
Charles Bally e il sujet entendant. Per una semiologia linguistica dell’altro
Basile Grazia
2025
Abstract
This essay aims to reconstruct on a historical-theoretical level how the centrality of the receiver was defined and consolidated in 20th century linguistics. An important milestone is Ferdinand de Saussure, who – inspired in particular by Wundt, Paul, Bréal and Ribot – formulated the role of the speaking subject as an indispensable component of his linguistic system. In Saussure’s framework, the speaking subject alternates between the roles of Monsieur A (the speaker) and Monsieur B (the receiver), as can be observed in the so-called circuit de la parole. The latter not only takes on decoding tasks but also has an active and creative role. With Charles Bally, however, Monsieur B receives a specific designation (that of the sujet entendant in its double function as perceiver and interpreter/hermeneut) and becomes the cornerstone of a more general theoretical construction. Without the sujet entendant there is neither a perceptive-sensory activity nor a semiotic-cognitive activity. Thus, the sujet entendant becomes the site of the existence and legitimization of language and its continuous interpragmatic confirmation at the level of understanding.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


