Academic freedom, reduced to the decision-making autonomy of individuals within a competitive system, takes on a paradoxical form. Incapable of claiming an unconditional freedom of inquiry and proposition, the university has ceased to present itself as a space of unconditional speech (Derrida, Rovatti, 2002), free from external political and economic constraints. This results in a narrowing of the possibility of formulating radical questions, especially those capable of challenging its own as-sumptions, its public role, and its social function. On these premises, the essay aims to show how the critical function of the university becomes atrophied, not so much through authoritarian imposition, but rather through a progressive internalization of neoliberal logics, which render every dissonant voice superfluous by means of a sinister government through freedom (Dardot, Laval, 20192).
La libertà accademica, ridotta ad autonomia decisionale degli individui all’interno di un sistema competitivo, assume una forma paradossale. Incapace di rivendicare una libertà incondizionata di interrogazione e proposizione, l’università ha cessato di configurarsi come spazio di parola incondizionata (Derrida, Rovatti, 2002), sottratta a vincoli esterni di natura politica ed eco-nomica. Ne deriva un restringimento della possibilità di formulare domande radicali, in parti-colare quelle capaci di mettere in discussione i propri presupposti, il proprio ruolo pubblico e sociale. Assunte queste premesse, il saggio intende mostrare come la funzione critica dell’uni-versità si atrofizzi, non tanto per un’imposizione autoritaria, quanto per una progressiva interi-orizzazione delle logiche neoliberiste che rendono superflua ogni voce dissonante attraverso un sinistro governo per mezzo della libertà (Dardot, Laval, 20192).
La libertà moltiplicata e tradita. Ragione neoliberista, crisi della critica e università
Paola Martino
2025
Abstract
Academic freedom, reduced to the decision-making autonomy of individuals within a competitive system, takes on a paradoxical form. Incapable of claiming an unconditional freedom of inquiry and proposition, the university has ceased to present itself as a space of unconditional speech (Derrida, Rovatti, 2002), free from external political and economic constraints. This results in a narrowing of the possibility of formulating radical questions, especially those capable of challenging its own as-sumptions, its public role, and its social function. On these premises, the essay aims to show how the critical function of the university becomes atrophied, not so much through authoritarian imposition, but rather through a progressive internalization of neoliberal logics, which render every dissonant voice superfluous by means of a sinister government through freedom (Dardot, Laval, 20192).I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


