Michelangelo Antonioni's Blow-up is undoubtedly a classic: winner of the Grand Prix at the 20th Cannes Film Festival in 1967, it is, to paraphrase Italo Calvino in 1981, a film “that never finishes saying what it has to say,” similar to works “that exert a particular influence both by imposing themselves as unforgettable and by concealing themselves in the folds of memory through assimilation into the collective or individual unconscious.” We will therefore re-read it both in light of the traces of other visions and other readings interspersed up to the present day, as well in light of the question of limits, their figures, and their effects. Beyond its implicit and explicit iconography and intertextuality, the “classic” Blow-up contains also traces and images that problematise the film's contemporary visual culture. As Roland Barthes understood in the early 1980s, “the contents and forms [in Antonioni] are equally historical.” The contemporary world depicted in Blow-up is one in which several times and several temporalities of images coexist: the past, the present, and also the future. And these scenes ultimately call our present into question.

Seuils, taches, indices : limites et émergences du visuel dans Blow-up de Michelangelo Antonioni

Filippo Fimiani
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
2025

Abstract

Michelangelo Antonioni's Blow-up is undoubtedly a classic: winner of the Grand Prix at the 20th Cannes Film Festival in 1967, it is, to paraphrase Italo Calvino in 1981, a film “that never finishes saying what it has to say,” similar to works “that exert a particular influence both by imposing themselves as unforgettable and by concealing themselves in the folds of memory through assimilation into the collective or individual unconscious.” We will therefore re-read it both in light of the traces of other visions and other readings interspersed up to the present day, as well in light of the question of limits, their figures, and their effects. Beyond its implicit and explicit iconography and intertextuality, the “classic” Blow-up contains also traces and images that problematise the film's contemporary visual culture. As Roland Barthes understood in the early 1980s, “the contents and forms [in Antonioni] are equally historical.” The contemporary world depicted in Blow-up is one in which several times and several temporalities of images coexist: the past, the present, and also the future. And these scenes ultimately call our present into question.
2025
Blow-up de Michelangelo Antonioni est sans aucun doute un classique : Grand prix international au vingtième festival de Cannes en 1967, c’est, pour pasticher les mots d’Italo Calvino en 1981, un film « qui n’a jamais fini de dire ce qu’il a à dire », semblable aux oeuvres « qui exercent une influence particulière aussi bien en s’imposant comme inoubliables qu’en se dissimulant dans les replis de la mémoire par assimilation à l’inconscient collectif ou individuel ». On le relira donc à la fois à partir des traces d’autres visions et d’autres lectures intercalées jusqu’à aujourd’hui, et à partir de la question de la limite, de ses figures et de ses effets. Au-delà de l’iconographie et de l’intertextualité implicites et explicites, dans les replis du « classique » Blow-up se trouvent aussi les traces et les images d’un « classique », qui problématisent la culture visuelle contemporaine du film. Car, comme l’a bien compris Roland Barthes au début des années 1980, « les contenus et les formes [chez Antonioni] sont également historiques ». Si le contemporain mis en scène par Blow-up est un temps où coexistent plusieurs temps et plusieurs temporalités des images, du passé, du présent, et aussi du futur, ces scènes mettent finalement en question notre actualité.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11386/4932615
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact