Narratives are essential tools through which politicians and public figures construct shared meanings and shape public perception, both locally and globally. This paper introduces a computational approach for systematically identifying and analyzing narrative structures in political speeches, aiming to enhance our understanding of how politicians try to convey their messages. A novel ontology, OntoNarr (Ontology for Narrative Representation), is defined and used to identify narrative schemas within the full text of the speeches. The core contribution is a more interpretable and conceptually coherent method for comparing political speeches based on their underlying narrative structures. This is achieved by converting ontology-based representations into graph embeddings and visualizing them using scatterplots. Unlike traditional NLP pipelines that rely primarily on lexical and syntactic features, this method incorporates a formal semantic structure, addressing key limitations in conventional analysis. A case study involving speeches from four politicians demonstrates how historical context influences the choice of narrative schema while also revealing some cross-temporal and cross-ideological similarities. Lastly, a method from granular computing is used to quantitatively evaluate the ontology-based approach.
Interacting with Political Narratives Through LLMs: An Approach Based on Ontologies and Graph Embeddings
Emanuele Damiano;Francesco Orciuoli;Antonella Pascuzzo
;Sabrina Senatore
2025
Abstract
Narratives are essential tools through which politicians and public figures construct shared meanings and shape public perception, both locally and globally. This paper introduces a computational approach for systematically identifying and analyzing narrative structures in political speeches, aiming to enhance our understanding of how politicians try to convey their messages. A novel ontology, OntoNarr (Ontology for Narrative Representation), is defined and used to identify narrative schemas within the full text of the speeches. The core contribution is a more interpretable and conceptually coherent method for comparing political speeches based on their underlying narrative structures. This is achieved by converting ontology-based representations into graph embeddings and visualizing them using scatterplots. Unlike traditional NLP pipelines that rely primarily on lexical and syntactic features, this method incorporates a formal semantic structure, addressing key limitations in conventional analysis. A case study involving speeches from four politicians demonstrates how historical context influences the choice of narrative schema while also revealing some cross-temporal and cross-ideological similarities. Lastly, a method from granular computing is used to quantitatively evaluate the ontology-based approach.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


