Questo saggio esamina la prima versione del Cristo di Michelangelo per Santa Maria sopra Minerva alla luce del paradigma teorico vasariano di “perfezione” e “difficoltà”. Attraverso un’analisi delle prove documentarie e stilistiche, lo studio propone che Pompeo Ferrucci abbia completato il marmo incompiuto originariamente abbandonato da Michelangelo a causa di un difetto nella pietra. La storia di questa scultura diventa una lente attraverso cui riconsiderare la nozione vasariana di perficere – l’atto di portare a perfezione – come una dialettica tra ideale e imperfezione. Allo stesso tempo, essa illumina il passaggio dal modello rinascimentale della maestria artistica individuale alle pratiche collettive della scultura seicentesca, nelle quali il completamento dell’opera acquisisce un significato teologico e culturale oltre che un valore estetico.
This essay examines the first version of Michelangelo’s Christ for Santa Maria sopra Minerva in light of Vasari’s theoretical paradigm of “perfection” and “difficulty.” Through an analysis of both documentary and stylistic evidence, the study proposes that Pompeo Ferrucci completed the unfinished marble originally abandoned by Michelangelo because of a flaw in the stone. The history of this sculpture becomes a lens through which to reconsider Vasari’s notion of perficere – the act of bringing to perfection – as a dialectic between ideal and imperfection. At the same time, it illuminates the shift from the Renaissance model of individual artistic mastery to the collective practices of seventeenth-century sculpture, in which the completion of the work acquires theological and cultural significance as well as aesthetic value.
Vasari, Michelangelo e la perfezione. La prima versione del Cristo per la Minerva e una proposta per Pompeo Ferrucci
ADRIANO AMENDOLA
2025
Abstract
This essay examines the first version of Michelangelo’s Christ for Santa Maria sopra Minerva in light of Vasari’s theoretical paradigm of “perfection” and “difficulty.” Through an analysis of both documentary and stylistic evidence, the study proposes that Pompeo Ferrucci completed the unfinished marble originally abandoned by Michelangelo because of a flaw in the stone. The history of this sculpture becomes a lens through which to reconsider Vasari’s notion of perficere – the act of bringing to perfection – as a dialectic between ideal and imperfection. At the same time, it illuminates the shift from the Renaissance model of individual artistic mastery to the collective practices of seventeenth-century sculpture, in which the completion of the work acquires theological and cultural significance as well as aesthetic value.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


