This study explores and illustrates solutions to a key challenge in historical accounting research: the collection of archival evidence. Aimed at readers who are new to accounting history and lack prior experience in the field, the study introduces two distinct approaches to archival research. The first approach begins with the availability of archival documents, requiring the researcher to select an appropriate theory to analyze the evidence. In contrast, the second approach starts with a theoretical framework, guiding the selection of both the case to be examined and the evidence to be collected. To demonstrate these approaches, the study presents an exploratory case that highlights the critical decisions researchers must make when searching for and evaluating archival evidence
Navigating the Sea of Accounting History Research: From Evidence Collection to Theory Selection
Valerio Antonelli
;Emanuela Mattia Cafaro;Raffaele D'Alessio
In corso di stampa
Abstract
This study explores and illustrates solutions to a key challenge in historical accounting research: the collection of archival evidence. Aimed at readers who are new to accounting history and lack prior experience in the field, the study introduces two distinct approaches to archival research. The first approach begins with the availability of archival documents, requiring the researcher to select an appropriate theory to analyze the evidence. In contrast, the second approach starts with a theoretical framework, guiding the selection of both the case to be examined and the evidence to be collected. To demonstrate these approaches, the study presents an exploratory case that highlights the critical decisions researchers must make when searching for and evaluating archival evidenceI documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


