Large Language Models (LLMs) show potential for generating synthetic clinical data, addressing privacy and data scarcity challenges. This study investigates how prompt design influences the statistical realism of such data, comparing structured versus narrative prompts across different model architectures and sizes. Evaluating six LLMs with Jensen-Shannon divergence and Kolmogorov-Smirnov metrics, the results reveal that performance depends on the interaction between prompt style and model type: proprietary models favor structured prompts, while large open-weight models perform better with narrative ones. Model size alone does not guarantee higher data quality. These findings highlight the need to adapt prompt design to model characteristics to improve the realism of synthetic clinical data.

How Prompt Design Affects Synthetic Healthcare Data Generated by LLMs

Fraenza, Valeria
;
Cascone, Lucia;Iommazzo, Camilla;Nappi, Michele;Ritrovato, Pierluigi
2026

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) show potential for generating synthetic clinical data, addressing privacy and data scarcity challenges. This study investigates how prompt design influences the statistical realism of such data, comparing structured versus narrative prompts across different model architectures and sizes. Evaluating six LLMs with Jensen-Shannon divergence and Kolmogorov-Smirnov metrics, the results reveal that performance depends on the interaction between prompt style and model type: proprietary models favor structured prompts, while large open-weight models perform better with narrative ones. Model size alone does not guarantee higher data quality. These findings highlight the need to adapt prompt design to model characteristics to improve the realism of synthetic clinical data.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11386/4964736
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact