INTRODUCTION: The integrity of the upper cervical spine is essential for survival and function, because of the neurovascular structures contained within its bony elements. Fractures of the upper cervical spine (C1-C2) are frequent. This systematic review assesses the efficacy and safety of the conservative management in Halo vest for patients with upper cervical spine fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two reviewers independently identified studies in English, by a systematic search of CINAHL, Embase, Medline, HealthSTAR, and the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, from inception of each database to 28 January 2010, using various combinations of the keywords terms "odontoid fractures", hangman's fractures", "axis fractures", "axis", "atlas", "Jefferson fractures", "C1 arch fractures", "C1 fractures", "C2 fractures", "cervical spine", "injuries", "fracture", "trauma", "neck injury", "surgery". RESULTS: A total of 43 citations were obtained. An additional 4 papers were obtained from the reference list of the studies included. The 47 studies that were included described a total of 1078 patients with C1-C2 fractures managed by halo fixator. CONCLUSIONS: The halo fixator has a well defined place in the management of fractures of the cervical spine. Clearly, studies of higher level of evidence, for instance large randomised trials, should be conducted, even though the available evidences suggest that management of upper cervical spine fracture with halo fixator is safe and effective.

Upper cervical spine injuries: indications and limits of the conservative management in Halo vest. A systematic review of efficacy and safety.

MAFFULLI, Nicola;
2010

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The integrity of the upper cervical spine is essential for survival and function, because of the neurovascular structures contained within its bony elements. Fractures of the upper cervical spine (C1-C2) are frequent. This systematic review assesses the efficacy and safety of the conservative management in Halo vest for patients with upper cervical spine fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two reviewers independently identified studies in English, by a systematic search of CINAHL, Embase, Medline, HealthSTAR, and the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, from inception of each database to 28 January 2010, using various combinations of the keywords terms "odontoid fractures", hangman's fractures", "axis fractures", "axis", "atlas", "Jefferson fractures", "C1 arch fractures", "C1 fractures", "C2 fractures", "cervical spine", "injuries", "fracture", "trauma", "neck injury", "surgery". RESULTS: A total of 43 citations were obtained. An additional 4 papers were obtained from the reference list of the studies included. The 47 studies that were included described a total of 1078 patients with C1-C2 fractures managed by halo fixator. CONCLUSIONS: The halo fixator has a well defined place in the management of fractures of the cervical spine. Clearly, studies of higher level of evidence, for instance large randomised trials, should be conducted, even though the available evidences suggest that management of upper cervical spine fracture with halo fixator is safe and effective.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11386/4198858
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact