Storage, transfer and feeding of biomass particulate solids often cause problems at biobased production sites. Irregular flow and blockage in storage units create supply uncertainties and production stops with economically detrimental consequences. Despite the industrial awareness of these problems, reliable analysis methods for prediction of larger particle size biomass bulk solid flow properties are lacking. In this study, the silo discharge and arching behavior of different size fractions of wood chips from beech and pine forest residues were analyzed, utilizing a parallelepiped bin and a wedge-shaped hopper. The wood chip assortments were analyzed by Schulze shear testing, angle of repose, Hausner ratio, and bulk density. Obtained material data was utilized to build regression models versus the experimentally obtained critical hopper outlet size for material flow. The best fitted regression model for explaining the critical hopper outlet size was obtained with an equation with linear proportionality to the hopper half opening angle and to the square of the angle of repose. This regression model was well fitted to both assortments and over the whole particle size range, indicating robustness and that the proposed model can be useful to diagnose the silo discharge behavior for broad ranges of wood chip materials. The extension of the results of this paper to larger scale silos requires further investigation.

Predicting the silo discharge behavior of wood chips - A choice of method

Poletto, Massimo;Barletta, Diego;
2019-01-01

Abstract

Storage, transfer and feeding of biomass particulate solids often cause problems at biobased production sites. Irregular flow and blockage in storage units create supply uncertainties and production stops with economically detrimental consequences. Despite the industrial awareness of these problems, reliable analysis methods for prediction of larger particle size biomass bulk solid flow properties are lacking. In this study, the silo discharge and arching behavior of different size fractions of wood chips from beech and pine forest residues were analyzed, utilizing a parallelepiped bin and a wedge-shaped hopper. The wood chip assortments were analyzed by Schulze shear testing, angle of repose, Hausner ratio, and bulk density. Obtained material data was utilized to build regression models versus the experimentally obtained critical hopper outlet size for material flow. The best fitted regression model for explaining the critical hopper outlet size was obtained with an equation with linear proportionality to the hopper half opening angle and to the square of the angle of repose. This regression model was well fitted to both assortments and over the whole particle size range, indicating robustness and that the proposed model can be useful to diagnose the silo discharge behavior for broad ranges of wood chip materials. The extension of the results of this paper to larger scale silos requires further investigation.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
153096_Predicting the silo discharge behavior of wood chips - A choice of method.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.11.023
Tipologia: Documento in Pre-print (manoscritto inviato all'editore, precedente alla peer review)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.66 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.66 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
39 Barletta Definitivo.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 1.6 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.6 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11386/4722230
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 19
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 17
social impact