The COVID-19 pandemic caused what the United Nations called the biggest education disruption in history, affecting 1.6 billion pupils. The first pandemic phase imposed a sudden transition from face-to face teaching to emergency remote teaching. Distance learning was necessary to ensure educational continuity and, at the same time, it represented an opportunity to explore new ways of teaching. The suspension of face-to-face activities had a negative impact on both student learning and participation in teaching practices. Many scientific studies and national-international surveys report a worsening in school performance and an increase in learning loss. In particular, scientific disciplines have suffered the greatest learning loss. There are several causes: socio-cultural context; unfamiliarity with technologies on the part of both teachers and learners; the stress generated by the pandemic, which has amplified the already well-known problems relating to scientific learning; and the greater difficulties encountered by parents in supporting their children in carrying out homework. The aim of this contribution is to focus on the strategies and methodologies adopted in Mathematics in both distance learning and blended learning in order to grasp their positive or negative impact on learning in the pandemic period. The reference literature returns a vast production relating to the approaches used in scientific sectors (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) which make use of teaching practices based on authentic learning tasks. For example, Mathematics is best learned in the classroom, in fact Mathematics classroom is a laboratory of experiential practices, a place where students and teachers interact, negotiate, share and construct meanings according to a socio-constructivist perspective. This approach combines teacher-centered methodologies with student-centered ones, mobilizing metacognitive strategies both individually and collaboratively. Methodologically, a literature review has been carried out in order to draw a summary framework on the object of analysis. The research questions that have guided this work are: What do the surveys show about mathematical learning during the pandemic? How much has distance learning impacted on mathematics teaching and learning? What are the most obvious consequences? The analysis carried out shows that the learning losses were grafted onto a starting situation that already presented significant problems in the mathematical field. A closer examination of the evidence shows that, despite the many problems encountered, the distance learning experience offered innovative teaching practices to better engage learners. In this respect, the empirical data provide a wealth of useful indications for future interventions aimed at organizing an integrated digital teaching.

MATHEMATICAL LEARNING BEFORE AND AFTER COVID-19: PRACTICES AND CONSEQUENCES

Rosa Vegliante
;
Antonio Marzano;Sergio Miranda;Carole Montefusco
2023-01-01

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic caused what the United Nations called the biggest education disruption in history, affecting 1.6 billion pupils. The first pandemic phase imposed a sudden transition from face-to face teaching to emergency remote teaching. Distance learning was necessary to ensure educational continuity and, at the same time, it represented an opportunity to explore new ways of teaching. The suspension of face-to-face activities had a negative impact on both student learning and participation in teaching practices. Many scientific studies and national-international surveys report a worsening in school performance and an increase in learning loss. In particular, scientific disciplines have suffered the greatest learning loss. There are several causes: socio-cultural context; unfamiliarity with technologies on the part of both teachers and learners; the stress generated by the pandemic, which has amplified the already well-known problems relating to scientific learning; and the greater difficulties encountered by parents in supporting their children in carrying out homework. The aim of this contribution is to focus on the strategies and methodologies adopted in Mathematics in both distance learning and blended learning in order to grasp their positive or negative impact on learning in the pandemic period. The reference literature returns a vast production relating to the approaches used in scientific sectors (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) which make use of teaching practices based on authentic learning tasks. For example, Mathematics is best learned in the classroom, in fact Mathematics classroom is a laboratory of experiential practices, a place where students and teachers interact, negotiate, share and construct meanings according to a socio-constructivist perspective. This approach combines teacher-centered methodologies with student-centered ones, mobilizing metacognitive strategies both individually and collaboratively. Methodologically, a literature review has been carried out in order to draw a summary framework on the object of analysis. The research questions that have guided this work are: What do the surveys show about mathematical learning during the pandemic? How much has distance learning impacted on mathematics teaching and learning? What are the most obvious consequences? The analysis carried out shows that the learning losses were grafted onto a starting situation that already presented significant problems in the mathematical field. A closer examination of the evidence shows that, despite the many problems encountered, the distance learning experience offered innovative teaching practices to better engage learners. In this respect, the empirical data provide a wealth of useful indications for future interventions aimed at organizing an integrated digital teaching.
2023
978-84-09-49026-4
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11386/4820091
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact