Background: We evaluated the relationship between diabetes and temporal characteristics of cardiac risk at long-term follow-up in a propensity score-matched cohort of diabetic and non-diabetic patients with normal stress myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (MPS). Methods and Results: We studied 828 consecutive patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease and normal perfusion at stress MPS. To account for differences in baseline characteristics between diabetics and non-diabetics, we created a propensity score-matched cohort considering clinical variables and stress type. After matching, clinical characteristics were comparable in 260 diabetic and 260 non-diabetic patients. All patients were followed for at least 1 year (median 53 months). End-point events were cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. At Cox analysis, diabetes (hazard ratio 3.9, P <.01) and post-stress left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (less-than or equal to)45% (hazard ratio 4.1, P <.01) were independent predictors of events. At parametric analysis, non-diabetic patients with post-stress LVEF >45% remained at low risk for the entire length of follow-up, while the highest probability of events and the major risk acceleration was observed in patients with diabetes and post-stress LVEF (less-than or equal to)45%. Conclusions: After a normal stress MPS, diabetic patients are at higher risk for cardiac events than non-diabetic subjects also after balancing clinical characteristics and stress type by propensity score analysis. The warranty period of a normal stress MPS varies according to diabetic status and post-stress LVEF. (copyright) 2013 American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

Warranty period of normal stress myocardial perfusion imaging in diabetic patients: A propensity score analysis

Cuocolo, Renato;
2014-01-01

Abstract

Background: We evaluated the relationship between diabetes and temporal characteristics of cardiac risk at long-term follow-up in a propensity score-matched cohort of diabetic and non-diabetic patients with normal stress myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (MPS). Methods and Results: We studied 828 consecutive patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease and normal perfusion at stress MPS. To account for differences in baseline characteristics between diabetics and non-diabetics, we created a propensity score-matched cohort considering clinical variables and stress type. After matching, clinical characteristics were comparable in 260 diabetic and 260 non-diabetic patients. All patients were followed for at least 1 year (median 53 months). End-point events were cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. At Cox analysis, diabetes (hazard ratio 3.9, P <.01) and post-stress left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (less-than or equal to)45% (hazard ratio 4.1, P <.01) were independent predictors of events. At parametric analysis, non-diabetic patients with post-stress LVEF >45% remained at low risk for the entire length of follow-up, while the highest probability of events and the major risk acceleration was observed in patients with diabetes and post-stress LVEF (less-than or equal to)45%. Conclusions: After a normal stress MPS, diabetic patients are at higher risk for cardiac events than non-diabetic subjects also after balancing clinical characteristics and stress type by propensity score analysis. The warranty period of a normal stress MPS varies according to diabetic status and post-stress LVEF. (copyright) 2013 American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11386/4842645
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 34
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 33
social impact