Context. Previous studies have revealed that the estimated probability of galaxy-galaxy strong lensing in observed galaxy clusters exceeds the expectations from the Lambda cold dark matter cosmological model by one order of magnitude.Aims. We aim to understand the origin of this excess by analyzing a larger set of simulated galaxy clusters, and investigating how the theoretical expectations vary under different adopted prescriptions and numerical implementations of star formation and feedback in simulations.Methods. We performed a ray-tracing analysis of 324 galaxy clusters from the THREE HUNDRED project, comparing the GADGET-X and GIZMO-SIMBA runs. These simulations, which start from the same initial conditions, were performed with different implementations of hydrodynamics and galaxy formation models tailored to match different observational properties of the intracluster medium and cluster galaxies.Results. We find that galaxies in the GIZMO-SIMBA simulations develop denser stellar cores than their GADGET-X counterparts. Consequently, their probability for galaxy-galaxy strong lensing is higher by a factor of similar to 3. This increment is still insufficient to fill the gap with observations as a discrepancy by a factor similar to 4 still persists. In addition, we find that several simulated galaxies have Einstein radii that are too large compared to observations.Conclusions. We conclude that a persistent excess of galaxy-galaxy strong lensing exists in observed galaxy clusters. The origin of this discrepancy with theoretical predictions is still unexplained in the framework of the cosmological hydrodynamical simulations. This might signal a hitherto unknown issue with either the simulation methods or our assumptions regarding the standard cosmological model.

A persistent excess of galaxy-galaxy strong lensing observed in galaxy clusters

Mercurio, Amata;
2023-01-01

Abstract

Context. Previous studies have revealed that the estimated probability of galaxy-galaxy strong lensing in observed galaxy clusters exceeds the expectations from the Lambda cold dark matter cosmological model by one order of magnitude.Aims. We aim to understand the origin of this excess by analyzing a larger set of simulated galaxy clusters, and investigating how the theoretical expectations vary under different adopted prescriptions and numerical implementations of star formation and feedback in simulations.Methods. We performed a ray-tracing analysis of 324 galaxy clusters from the THREE HUNDRED project, comparing the GADGET-X and GIZMO-SIMBA runs. These simulations, which start from the same initial conditions, were performed with different implementations of hydrodynamics and galaxy formation models tailored to match different observational properties of the intracluster medium and cluster galaxies.Results. We find that galaxies in the GIZMO-SIMBA simulations develop denser stellar cores than their GADGET-X counterparts. Consequently, their probability for galaxy-galaxy strong lensing is higher by a factor of similar to 3. This increment is still insufficient to fill the gap with observations as a discrepancy by a factor similar to 4 still persists. In addition, we find that several simulated galaxies have Einstein radii that are too large compared to observations.Conclusions. We conclude that a persistent excess of galaxy-galaxy strong lensing exists in observed galaxy clusters. The origin of this discrepancy with theoretical predictions is still unexplained in the framework of the cosmological hydrodynamical simulations. This might signal a hitherto unknown issue with either the simulation methods or our assumptions regarding the standard cosmological model.
2023
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11386/4856218
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact