Background: Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery is currently the optimal treatment for skull base tumors. This study was designed to assess patient's sinonasal symptoms and quality of life (QoL) after resection of pituitary adenoma or skull base tumors using vascularized septal flap (VSF) reconstruction. Methods: Patients with pituitary adenoma underwent the transnasal transsphenoidal endoscopic approach (TTEA; n = 38), and patients with other benign parasellar tumors underwent the expanded endonasal approach (EEA; n = 17) with VSF. Assessment of sinonasal symptoms and QoL by the 36-item Short-Form (SF-36) and the 31-item Rhinosinusitis Outcome Measure (RSOM-31) were performed before and 3 months after surgery. Results: At baseline, the total seven-sinonasal symptom score (T7SSS) was similar between both groups. After surgery, T7SSS significantly increased in EEA but not in TTEA patients. EEA patients reported more smell loss (40.1 +/- 26.2; p < 0.05) and posterior nasal discharge (49.3 +/- 30.1; p < 0.05) than TTEA patients (21.6 +/- 30.9 and 22.5 +/- 27.5, respectively). At baseline, both groups had poorer SF-36 compared with the general population. TTEA patients had poorer QoL (on general health, vitality, and mental health) than EEA patients. After surgery, TTEA patients showed impaired physical role and bodily pain compared with baseline, and EEA patients showed impaired physical role and mental health. At baseline, RSOM scores were similar in TTEA and EEA groups. After surgery, EEA but not TTEA patients reported poorer nasal and general symptoms. Conclusion: The EEA with VSF produces more sinonasal symptoms than pituitary surgery, surgery for skull base and pituitary tumors has negative impact on QoL, and functioning tumors have no further negative effect on sinonasal symptoms and QoL.

Expanded endonasal approach using vascularized septal flap reconstruction for skull base tumors has a negative impact on sinonasal symptoms and quality of life

de Notaris M;
2013-01-01

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery is currently the optimal treatment for skull base tumors. This study was designed to assess patient's sinonasal symptoms and quality of life (QoL) after resection of pituitary adenoma or skull base tumors using vascularized septal flap (VSF) reconstruction. Methods: Patients with pituitary adenoma underwent the transnasal transsphenoidal endoscopic approach (TTEA; n = 38), and patients with other benign parasellar tumors underwent the expanded endonasal approach (EEA; n = 17) with VSF. Assessment of sinonasal symptoms and QoL by the 36-item Short-Form (SF-36) and the 31-item Rhinosinusitis Outcome Measure (RSOM-31) were performed before and 3 months after surgery. Results: At baseline, the total seven-sinonasal symptom score (T7SSS) was similar between both groups. After surgery, T7SSS significantly increased in EEA but not in TTEA patients. EEA patients reported more smell loss (40.1 +/- 26.2; p < 0.05) and posterior nasal discharge (49.3 +/- 30.1; p < 0.05) than TTEA patients (21.6 +/- 30.9 and 22.5 +/- 27.5, respectively). At baseline, both groups had poorer SF-36 compared with the general population. TTEA patients had poorer QoL (on general health, vitality, and mental health) than EEA patients. After surgery, TTEA patients showed impaired physical role and bodily pain compared with baseline, and EEA patients showed impaired physical role and mental health. At baseline, RSOM scores were similar in TTEA and EEA groups. After surgery, EEA but not TTEA patients reported poorer nasal and general symptoms. Conclusion: The EEA with VSF produces more sinonasal symptoms than pituitary surgery, surgery for skull base and pituitary tumors has negative impact on QoL, and functioning tumors have no further negative effect on sinonasal symptoms and QoL.
2013
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11386/4858508
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 50
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 42
social impact