In order to investigate the reliability of correcting GAT formulas in comparison with dynamic contour tonometry (DCT), this study included 112 right eyes of 112 healthy subjects aged from 21 to 77 years, whose eyes underwent to a full ophthalmologic exam. IOP was measured in each eye with DCT and then with GAT. IOP values obtained with GAT were corrected with 10 equations and then compared with those provided by DCT. Participants mean age was 42.24 +/- 14.08 years; mean IOP measured with DCT was 17.61 +/- 2.87 and 15.50 +/- 2.47 mmHg, measured with GAT. The mean discordance between DCT and GAT measurements was 2.11 +/- 2.24 mmHg. All the correcting formulas, but Srodka one (p < 0.001), tend to increase the difference between GAT and DCT. According to these results Srodka equation provides the best correction, reducing the difference between the two IOP measurement methods of - 0.03 +/- 0.85 mmHg. Other equations do not provide a valid improvement of the agreement between the two methods or they provide a worsening of the agreement.
Comparison between dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry correcting equations
De Bernardo, Maddalena;Casaburi, Claudia;De Pascale, Ilaria;Cione, Ferdinando;Rosa, Nicola
2022-01-01
Abstract
In order to investigate the reliability of correcting GAT formulas in comparison with dynamic contour tonometry (DCT), this study included 112 right eyes of 112 healthy subjects aged from 21 to 77 years, whose eyes underwent to a full ophthalmologic exam. IOP was measured in each eye with DCT and then with GAT. IOP values obtained with GAT were corrected with 10 equations and then compared with those provided by DCT. Participants mean age was 42.24 +/- 14.08 years; mean IOP measured with DCT was 17.61 +/- 2.87 and 15.50 +/- 2.47 mmHg, measured with GAT. The mean discordance between DCT and GAT measurements was 2.11 +/- 2.24 mmHg. All the correcting formulas, but Srodka one (p < 0.001), tend to increase the difference between GAT and DCT. According to these results Srodka equation provides the best correction, reducing the difference between the two IOP measurement methods of - 0.03 +/- 0.85 mmHg. Other equations do not provide a valid improvement of the agreement between the two methods or they provide a worsening of the agreement.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.