Gödel’s theory revolutionized mathematical logic. It is based on the assumption of the non-demonstrability of the axioms in a given closed logic system. From these premises this work aims to address the issue of the non-derivability/non-decidability of law as emerging from Hans Kelsen’s Reine Rechtslehre. Therefore we will offer a critical and problematic comparison between Gödel and Kelsen, considered as epigones of a certain epistemological formalism.
Logica del dover essere Gödel e Kelsen: un confronto possibile?
VALITUTTI D
2021
Abstract
Gödel’s theory revolutionized mathematical logic. It is based on the assumption of the non-demonstrability of the axioms in a given closed logic system. From these premises this work aims to address the issue of the non-derivability/non-decidability of law as emerging from Hans Kelsen’s Reine Rechtslehre. Therefore we will offer a critical and problematic comparison between Gödel and Kelsen, considered as epigones of a certain epistemological formalism.File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
