The work critically retraces the jurisprudence’s prevailing position that disclaims the enforceability, in legal set-off, of credits ascertained by a provisional executable court judgment, which has not the authority of res judicata. The comparison with the legal rule and its underlying ratio legis, as well as a correct balancing of involved interest, lead to exclude that in legal set-off credits must be definite, even in trial.

Sulla certezza del credito nella compensazione legale

Immacolata Prisco
2015

Abstract

The work critically retraces the jurisprudence’s prevailing position that disclaims the enforceability, in legal set-off, of credits ascertained by a provisional executable court judgment, which has not the authority of res judicata. The comparison with the legal rule and its underlying ratio legis, as well as a correct balancing of involved interest, lead to exclude that in legal set-off credits must be definite, even in trial.
2015
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11386/4949673
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact