This theoreticalargumentative paper offers a pedagogical interpretation of the relationship between the fragility of the self and the vulnerability of crowds in the postmedia age. Its central claim is that collective disorientation, emotional contagion, and the lowering of reflective thresholds cannot be reduced either to individual weakness or to purely situational causes. Rather, these phenomena point to a broader transformation of communicative ecologies, forms of attention, and cultural devices that historically sustained alphabetic interiority. Drawing on de Kerckhove, Eco, Hayles, Landow, Latour, and Rivoltella, the essay argues that younger generations do not reject complexity; they process it through simultaneous, networked, and transmedia logics, often clashing with educational models grounded in the linearity of the page. The pedagogical task, therefore, is to design formative environments able to turn connection into understanding, speed into discernment, and participation into shared responsibility.
Il contributo, di natura teoricoargomentativa, propone una lettura pedagogica del nesso tra fragilità dell’io e vulnerabilità delle masse nell’epoca postmediale. L’ipotesi di fondo è che i fenomeni di disorientamento collettivo, di contagio emotivo e di abbassamento della soglia riflessiva non possano essere spiegati né come semplice somma di fragilità individuali né come puro effetto di situazione. Essi rinviano piuttosto a una trasformazione più ampia delle ecologie comunicative, delle forme dell’attenzione e dei dispositivi culturali che hanno sostenuto, per secoli, l’interiorità alfabetica. In dialogo con de Kerckhove, Eco, Hayles, Landow, Latour e Rivoltella, il saggio sostiene che le nuove generazioni non rifiutino la complessità, ma la attraversino secondo logiche simultanee, reticolari e transmediali, entrando in tensione con i modelli educativi costruiti sulla linearità della pagina. Ne deriva un compito pedagogico decisivo: progettare ambienti formativi capaci di tradurre la connessione in comprensione, la velocità in discernimento, la partecipazione in responsabilità condivisa.
The fragility of the self and the vulnerability of the masses in the postmedia age. Ecologies of connection, the crisis of the alphabetic paradigm, and the tasks of inclusive pedagogy
Monica Di Domenico
;Giovanna Rosaria Palmieri;Pio Alfredo Di Tore
2026
Abstract
This theoreticalargumentative paper offers a pedagogical interpretation of the relationship between the fragility of the self and the vulnerability of crowds in the postmedia age. Its central claim is that collective disorientation, emotional contagion, and the lowering of reflective thresholds cannot be reduced either to individual weakness or to purely situational causes. Rather, these phenomena point to a broader transformation of communicative ecologies, forms of attention, and cultural devices that historically sustained alphabetic interiority. Drawing on de Kerckhove, Eco, Hayles, Landow, Latour, and Rivoltella, the essay argues that younger generations do not reject complexity; they process it through simultaneous, networked, and transmedia logics, often clashing with educational models grounded in the linearity of the page. The pedagogical task, therefore, is to design formative environments able to turn connection into understanding, speed into discernment, and participation into shared responsibility.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


